The technology industry is filled with examples of automation testing failures. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to do end-to-end functions without any human supervision. The horrific and disastrous automation failures have allowed managers to think over the significance of manual testing again.
Artificial intelligence has failed to adapt to unpredictable misalignments and complications. In the absence of proper alignment, catastrophic results are generated. This happens in the case of automation testing in quality assurance. The majority of the types of software testing need manual testing. It enables troubleshooting and course correction.
Defining Automation Testing
Automation is advancing at a very quick rate in the software industry in comparison with other industries. Companies are implementing technological advancements like cloud storage and DevOps. It goes together with automation.
In fact, companies look for such automation testing companies. For this reason, the majority of the companies are showing an inclination towards automation as it leads to more savings. Managers automate workflows of the quality assurance teams and decrease costs on resources, infrastructure and productivity.
Manual Testing Incorporates Exploratory Testing
Exploratory testing is considered one of the most powerful forms of testing that the quality assurance team uses. It can be performed via manual testing. During the exploratory testing, testers explore the software in the absence of predefined plans.
It permits the tester to acclimatise to his results without the requirement to write other test cases. In the present DevOps period, exploratory testing has the entire spotlight. A tester can select any area of software and see the things that automation can never look at.
Automation testing is flexible to perform exploratory testing in an agile environment. Exploratory testing is performed in an environment where testing is manually performed.
Usability Testing Needs Human Testers
It is impossible to automate usability testing and you require human testers for that. A machine cannot be trained for bug identification in terms of usability. For this reason, it is not recommended to skip usability testing. Otherwise, this is going to increase the risks. Usability testing is an imperative stage in quality assurance. Usability testing cannot be done without involving humans.
Analytical Skills and Creativity
Adoption of automation testing does not demean human capabilities and the qualities. The experience, creativity and skills that testers bring to software testing are not match-able when it comes to depending on automated tests.
It assists them to organize their testing effort for every project in a different manner. There is zero replacement for rapid mental processing speed and analytical thinking. This does not mean that there is no importance of automation testing. Its significance remains but the requirement for human testers is important also.
Automated Tests Cannot Detect All the Bugs
The automation tests can contain bugs like app code. By writing automated tests with bugs it is obvious that the outcomes will also have bugs.
This can cause major problems in the post-production stage or when the app is released impacting the customer experience. As a result, you may prefer manual testing that can recognize bugs and guarantee that your QA team is on the correct path. Therefore, even the best automation testing companies have manual testers.
Manual Testing Cannot Be Completely Eradicated
The significance and the advantages of automated testing cannot be denied especially, when it comes to saving time and enhancing test accuracy.
However, it is not possible to have a vigorous Quality Assurance process in place by applying just automation. There are various quality assurance procedures that require human testers supported by automated tests. Therefore, manual testing is here to stay and we can witness a bright future for the quality assurance testers.